Is This The Death Of Video Game Reviews?

The relationship between the video game industry and the gaming media has always been quite tenuous. Even before things started to really get rocky, as a long-time gamer, I could never help shake the feeling that the two parties only remained acquainted because of a few mutual benefits.

Basically, the gaming industry provided the news media with advanced copies and press opportunities, and in return, they got publicity. And for a while, all was well. Until of course, video game giant, Bethesda Softworks, decided to no longer provide review copies of their games before release, meaning the industry’s media could no longer warn of or promote potentially bad or good products prior to their sale. When stated like that, Bethesda certainly seems like the villain in this story. Indeed, their new practice is quite devious and anti-consumer. However, that hasn’t stopped the traditional games media from dissolving themselves of any sympathy they could’ve had. 

Screen Shot 2017-05-22 at 10.59.14 am.png

Just so you know, I definitely do not agree with Bethesda’s stance on video game reviews. Effectively, they are trying to control their marketing message as much as possible while hiding under the pretence that it is to create ‘equality’ in the gaming community, where everyone gets to experience their games at the same time. What a load of horseshit nonsense. But what is more alarming to me than that, is the way some of the games media’s biggest websites and companies have gone about combatting that obstacle. 

The most prominent of these in a recent situation was IGN’s review of Bethesda game, Prey, where editor Dan Stapleton significantly demerited the title based on a game-breaking bug he encountered on the PC version, only to later update the review two days later, once the bug was patched.

Screen Shot 2017-05-22 at 11.00.25 am.png

Now, in most other cases, this would be perfectly fine. Too many publishers and developers nowadays, especially Bethesda, get away with not properly QA testing their games, resulting in broken or flawed products. However, with IGN, the matter is altered when you take a look at their previous reviews of similarly ‘broken’ games. For example, Skyrim and Fallout 4 both earned a score of 9.5 from IGN, despite having had widespread technical issues and game-breaking occurrences. Meanwhile, Prey got demoted down to a ‘bad’ for something that only a minority of players experienced.

Perhaps the most important part about reviewing games is consistency. A readership is garnered from reliability, which may be hard to do with a full company of employees and reviewers. But that principle still remains true, especially in this situation, where Dan Stapleton was the reviewer for Fallout 4 and Prey, yet for the latter, decided to be far harsher on issues both games shared. Could all of this possibly have been IGN’s way of punishing Bethesda for their review policy? Maybe. 

It’s too hard to tell anything at this point, and the best that can be made are merely assumptions. However, what I can say, without a doubt, is that gamers are beginning to turn on the media more than they are Bethesda. If more publishers take notice and decide to follow similar review policies, it could mean that all of these big gaming websites lose their greatest advantage. It won’t be the end of video game reviews, just the ones that relied on timeliness above everything else. Which means that some of these websites and reviewers might have to get some kind of personality to keep readers coming back.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Is This The Death Of Video Game Reviews?

  1. I wouldn’t say game reviews will be dead it’s more like games journalism is dead. I say that because a good amount of the large sites like Polygon and Kotaku don’t know how to separate their political views from news a lot of the time, I’ve seen some articles from those sights finding ways to shit on games because it either doesn’t go with their political ideals/agendas like the upcoming Call of Duty WWII. In their reviews some of their writers will complain about things like a lack of diversity. As far as Bethesda not having pre release press copies I kind of think it’s a good concept only because it can help some of the smaller sites/reviewers contend with the big dogs.

    Liked by 1 person

    • There is a time and a place for political views, and it can be in your opinions for a video game. However, what I don’t like is some of these sites trying to appear more objective than they really are.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Personally I think it’s acceptable so long as they don’t shit on the game because of their views or have a very biased review because of it. Sites trying to seem more objective than they really are a pain but you can tell at times if they’re putting up a front or not.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s